facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2010 Toyota Matrix vs 2013 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

2010 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon Man FWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3
5dr Wagon Auto FWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3
5dr Wagon Man S FWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S FWD Cargo Volume60.9 ft31.72 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S AWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3
5dr Wagon Man XRS FWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3
5dr Wagon Auto XRS FWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3

2013 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon Man L FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Auto L FWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3
5dr Wagon Man S FWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S FWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S AWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3

Go to the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2010 vs. 2006

2007 vs. 2009

2008 vs. 2011

2003 vs. 2012

2004 vs. 2013