facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2010 Toyota Matrix vs 2012 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

2010 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon Man FWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3
5dr Wagon Auto FWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3
5dr Wagon Man S FWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S FWD Cargo Volume60.9 ft31.72 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S AWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3
5dr Wagon Man XRS FWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3
5dr Wagon Auto XRS FWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3

2012 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon Man L FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Auto L FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Man S FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S AWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3

Go to the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2007 vs. 2004

2011 vs. 2010

2012 vs. 2008

2009 vs. 2013

2006 vs. 2003