facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2006 Toyota Matrix vs 2003 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

2006 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon STD Manual Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon STD Auto Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon STD Auto AWD Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon XR Manual Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon XR Auto Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon XR Auto AWD Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon XRS 6-Spd Manual Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3

2003 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon Std Manual Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon Std Auto Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon Std Auto AWD Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon XR Manual Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon XR Auto Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon XR Auto AWD Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon XRS 6-Spd Manual Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon XRS Auto Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3

Go to the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2013 vs. 2011

2012 vs. 2008

2009 vs. 2003

2007 vs. 2004

2010 vs. 2006