facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs 2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
3dr Coupe Man GS Trunk Volume15.7 ft30.44 m3
3dr Coupe Auto GS Trunk Volume15.7 ft30.44 m3
3dr Coupe Auto GS Sport Trunk Volume15.7 ft30.44 m3
3dr Coupe Man GT Trunk Volume15.7 ft30.44 m3
3dr Coupe Auto GT Trunk Volume15.7 ft30.44 m3
2dr Spyder Auto GS Trunk Volume5.2 ft30.15 m3
2dr Spyder Auto GT Trunk Volume5.2 ft30.15 m3

2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Convertible Spyder GS 2.4L Manual Trunk Volume17.0 ft30.48 m3
2dr Convertible Spyder GS 2.4L Sportronic Trunk Volume17.0 ft30.48 m3
2dr Convertible Spyder GT 3.0L Manual Trunk Volume17.0 ft30.48 m3
2dr Convertible Spyder GT 3.0L Sportronic Trunk Volume17.0 ft30.48 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2010 vs. 2003

1997 vs. 2002

2012 vs. 2022

2004 vs. 1999

1998 vs. 2006