facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan Man DE Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT DE Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan Man ES Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT ES Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan Man ES-Sport Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT ES-Sport Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan Man GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan TC-SST Ralliart Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
4dr Sedan Man GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Man DE FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT GT FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SE AWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
TC-SST Ralliart AWD Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
Evolution Man GSR AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
TC-SST MR AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2009 vs. 2003

2010 vs. 2006

2015 vs. 2013

2012 vs. 2014

2004 vs. 2002