facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2009 Ford Mustang vs 2012 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2009 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Coupe Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe Premium Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe GT Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe GT Premium Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe Shelby GT500 Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Conv Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible Premium Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Premium Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible Shelby GT500 Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3

2012 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Coupe V6 Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe V6 Premium Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe GT Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe GT Premium Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe Boss 302 Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe Shelby GT500 Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Convertible V6 Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible V6 Premium Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Premium Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible Shelby GT500 Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3

Go to the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2009 vs. 2014

2002 vs. 2012

2003 vs. 2008

2015 vs. 2021

2010 vs. 1996