facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2006 Dodge Dakota vs 1999 Dodge Dakota

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

2006 Dodge Dakota

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
2WD Club Cab 6.5 Ft Box ST Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
2WD Club Cab 6.5 Ft Box SLT Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
2WD Club Cab 6.5 Ft Box Laramie Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
2WD Quad Cab 5.3 Ft Box ST Cargo Volume38.2 ft31.08 m3
2WD Quad Cab 5.3 Ft Box SLT Cargo Volume38.2 ft31.08 m3
2WD Quad Cab 5.3 Ft Box Laramie Cargo Volume38.2 ft31.08 m3
4WD Club Cab 6.5 Ft Box ST Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
4WD Club Cab 6.5 Ft Box SLT Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
4WD Club Cab 6.5 Ft Box Laramie Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
4WD Quad Cab 5.3 Ft Box ST Cargo Volume38.2 ft31.08 m3
4WD Quad Cab 5.3 Ft Box SLT Cargo Volume38.2 ft31.08 m3
4WD Quad Cab 5.3 Ft Box Laramie Cargo Volume38.2 ft31.08 m3

1999 Dodge Dakota

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
2WD Regular Cab 6.5 Ft Box Base Cargo Volume47.1 ft31.33 m3
2WD Regular Cab 6.5 Ft Box Sport Cargo Volume47.1 ft31.33 m3
2WD Regular Cab 6.5 Ft Box SLT Cargo Volume47.1 ft31.33 m3
2WD Regular Cab 8 Ft Box Base Cargo Volume58.1 ft31.65 m3
2WD Regular Cab 8 Ft Box Sport Cargo Volume58.1 ft31.65 m3
2WD Regular Cab 8 Ft Box SLT Cargo Volume58.1 ft31.65 m3
2WD Club Cab 6.5 Ft Box Base Cargo Volume47.1 ft31.33 m3
2WD Club Cab 6.5 Ft Box Sport Cargo Volume47.1 ft31.33 m3
2WD Club Cab 6.5 Ft Box SLT Cargo Volume47.1 ft31.33 m3
4WD Regular Cab 6.5 Ft Box Base Cargo Volume47.1 ft31.33 m3
4WD Regular Cab 6.5 Ft Box Sport Cargo Volume47.1 ft31.33 m3
4WD Regular Cab 6.5 Ft Box SLT Cargo Volume47.1 ft31.33 m3
4WD Club Cab 6.5 Ft Box Base Cargo Volume47.1 ft31.33 m3
4WD Club Cab 6.5 Ft Box Sport Cargo Volume47.1 ft31.33 m3
4WD Club Cab 6.5 Ft Box SLT Cargo Volume47.1 ft31.33 m3

Go to the Dodge Dakota Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Dodge Dakota Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2010 vs. 2001

2005 vs. 2007

2003 vs. 1996

1997 vs. 2009

2008 vs. 2002