facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan ES Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan ES Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan LS Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Man ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT ES AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SE AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SEL AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2012 vs. 2009

2005 vs. 2016

2013 vs. 2004

2017 vs. 2008

2010 vs. 2015