facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan ES Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan ES Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan LS Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan ES Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan ES Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan LS Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2008 vs. 2016

2010 vs. 2014

2009 vs. 2012

2004 vs. 2005

2002 vs. 2006