facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Convertible Spyder GS Manual Trunk Volume5.1 ft30.14 m3
2dr Convertible Spyder GS Auto Trunk Volume5.1 ft30.14 m3
2dr Convertible Spyder GS-T Turbo Manual Trunk Volume5.1 ft30.14 m3
2dr Convertible Spyder GS-T Turbo Auto Trunk Volume5.1 ft30.14 m3

2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
3dr Coupe Man GS Trunk Volume15.7 ft30.44 m3
3dr Coupe Auto GS Trunk Volume15.7 ft30.44 m3
3dr Coupe Auto GS Sport Trunk Volume15.7 ft30.44 m3
3dr Coupe Man GT Trunk Volume15.7 ft30.44 m3
3dr Coupe Auto GT Trunk Volume15.7 ft30.44 m3
2dr Spyder Auto GS Trunk Volume5.2 ft30.15 m3
2dr Spyder Auto GT Trunk Volume5.2 ft30.15 m3

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
3dr Coupe RS Manual Cargo Volume34.0 ft30.96 m3
3dr Coupe RS Auto Cargo Volume16.6 ft30.47 m3
3dr Coupe GS Manual Cargo Volume34.0 ft30.96 m3
3dr Coupe GS Auto Cargo Volume34.0 ft30.96 m3
3dr Coupe GS-T Turbo Manual Cargo Volume34.0 ft30.96 m3
3dr Coupe GS-T Turbo Auto Cargo Volume34.0 ft30.96 m3
3dr Coupe GSX Turbo Manual AWD Cargo Volume28.7 ft30.81 m3
3dr Coupe GSX Turbo Auto AWD Cargo Volume28.7 ft30.81 m3

No Data Available: 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cargo Volume

Go to the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2003 vs. 1998

2011 vs. 1999

2009 vs. 2000

2023 vs. 2010

2002 vs. 2006