facebook pixel

Rolls-Royce Cullinan Legroom (2022 - 2023)

Researched By The AutoPadre Research Team


In the first row, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan legroom ranges from a minimum of 39 inches to a maximum of 39.6 inches.

The Rolls-Royce Cullinan has a minimum of 42 inches and a maximum of 42.9 inches of second row legroom.

Check out the Legroom specifications for other makes and models.

Jump To Model Year

2020's

2023 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Legroom

In the first row, the 2023 Rolls-Royce Cullinan legroom is 39.6 inches.

The second row legroom of the 2023 Rolls-Royce Cullinan is 42.9 inches.

For legroom data by trim level, see the table below.

2023 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Legroom (Imperial)
Trim Engine | Transmission | Drivetrain First Row Legroom Second Row Legroom
Base Sport Utility Luxury 6.7L | Twin Turbo | V12 | 8 Spd Auto w/OD | AWD 39.6 in. 42.9 in.
Black Badge Sport Utility Luxury 6.7L | Twin Turbo | V12 | 8 Spd Auto w/OD | AWD 39.6 in. 42.9 in.
2023 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Legroom (Metric)
Trim Engine | Transmission | Drivetrain First Row Legroom Second Row Legroom
Base Sport Utility Luxury 6.7L | Twin Turbo | V12 | 8 Spd Auto w/OD | AWD 101 cm 109 cm
Black Badge Sport Utility Luxury 6.7L | Twin Turbo | V12 | 8 Spd Auto w/OD | AWD 101 cm 109 cm

2022 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Legroom

In the first row, the 2022 Rolls-Royce Cullinan legroom is 39 inches.

The second row legroom of the 2022 Rolls-Royce Cullinan is 42 inches.

For legroom data by trim level, see the table below.

2022 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Legroom (Imperial)
Trim Engine | Transmission | Drivetrain First Row Legroom Second Row Legroom
Base Sport SUV 6.7L | Twin Turbo | V12 | 8 Spd Auto w/OD | AWD 39 in. 42 in.
2022 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Legroom (Metric)
Trim Engine | Transmission | Drivetrain First Row Legroom Second Row Legroom
Base Sport SUV 6.7L | Twin Turbo | V12 | 8 Spd Auto w/OD | AWD 99 cm 106 cm
Rolls-Royce Cullinan Legroom Data Brought To You By AutoPadre
Rolls-Royce Cullinan Legroom Data Brought To You By AutoPadre

Rolls-Royce Cullinan Legroom Comparisons By Year