facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2018 Ford Focus

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
ES2.4L I44WD58.34.86148.11.48
ES2.0L I4FWD58.34.86148.11.48
GT2.4L I4FWD58.74.89149.11.49
SE2.4L I44WD58.34.86148.11.48
SEL2.4L I44WD58.34.86148.11.48

2018 Ford Focus

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
FWD58.24.85147.81.48
RS2.3LAWD584.83147.31.47
SE2.0L I4FWD57.74.81146.61.47
SEL2.0L I4FWD57.74.81146.61.47
ST2.0LFWD58.44.87148.31.48
Titanium2.0L I4FWD57.74.81146.61.47
S2.0L I4FWD57.74.81146.61.47
SE EcoBoost1.0LFWD57.74.81146.61.47
SE1.0LFWD57.74.81146.61.47
SEL2.0L I4FWD57.74.81146.61.47
Titanium2.0L I4FWD57.74.81146.61.47

Length

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
ES2.4L I44WD182.115.17462.54.62
ES2.0L I4FWD182.115.17462.54.62
GT2.4L I4FWD182.115.17462.54.62
SE2.4L I44WD182.115.17462.54.62
SEL2.4L I44WD182.115.17462.54.62

2018 Ford Focus

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
FWD172.914.41439.24.39
RS2.3LAWD172.814.4438.94.39
SE2.0L I4FWD171.614.3435.94.36
SEL2.0L I4FWD171.614.3435.94.36
ST2.0LFWD171.714.31436.14.36
Titanium2.0L I4FWD171.614.3435.94.36
S2.0L I4FWD178.514.88453.44.53
SE EcoBoost1.0LFWD178.514.88453.44.53
SE1.0LFWD178.514.88453.44.53
SEL2.0L I4FWD178.514.88453.44.53
Titanium2.0L I4FWD178.514.88453.44.53

Width Without Mirrors

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
ES2.4L I44WD69.45.78176.31.76
ES2.0L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
GT2.4L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
SE2.4L I44WD69.45.78176.31.76
SEL2.4L I44WD69.45.78176.31.76

2018 Ford Focus

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
FWD71.85.98182.41.82
RS2.3LAWD71.75.98182.11.82
SE2.0L I4FWD71.85.98182.41.82
SEL2.0L I4FWD71.85.98182.41.82
ST2.0LFWD71.75.98182.11.82
Titanium2.0L I4FWD71.85.98182.41.82
S2.0L I4FWD71.85.98182.41.82
SE EcoBoost1.0LFWD71.85.98182.41.82
SE1.0LFWD71.85.98182.41.82
SEL2.0L I4FWD71.85.98182.41.82
Titanium2.0L I4FWD71.85.98182.41.82

Wheelbase

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
ES2.4L I44WD103.78.64263.42.63
ES2.0L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
GT2.4L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
SE2.4L I44WD103.78.64263.42.63
SEL2.4L I44WD103.78.64263.42.63

2018 Ford Focus

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
FWD104.38.69264.92.65
RS2.3LAWD104.28.68264.72.65
SE2.0L I4FWD104.38.69264.92.65
SEL2.0L I4FWD104.38.69264.92.65
ST2.0LFWD104.38.69264.92.65
Titanium2.0L I4FWD104.38.69264.92.65
S2.0L I4FWD104.38.69264.92.65
SE EcoBoost1.0LFWD104.38.69264.92.65
SE1.0LFWD104.38.69264.92.65
SEL2.0L I4FWD104.38.69264.92.65
Titanium2.0L I4FWD104.38.69264.92.65

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Vehicle Dimensions Data or the Ford Focus Vehicle Dimensions Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2011 vs. 2002

2009 vs. 2012

2015 vs. 2005

2017 vs. 2010

2004 vs. 2006

Popular Vehicle Dimensions Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)