facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2013 Toyota Land Cruiser vs 2002 Toyota Land Cruiser

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2013 Toyota Land Cruiser

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
5.7L V84WD746.171881.88

2002 Toyota Land Cruiser

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
4.7L V84WD73.26.1185.91.86

Length

2013 Toyota Land Cruiser

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
5.7L V84WD194.916.244954.95

2002 Toyota Land Cruiser

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
4.7L V84WD192.516.04488.94.89

Width Without Mirrors

2013 Toyota Land Cruiser

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
5.7L V84WD77.66.47197.11.97

2002 Toyota Land Cruiser

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
4.7L V84WD76.46.37194.11.94

Wheelbase

2013 Toyota Land Cruiser

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
5.7L V84WD112.29.352852.85

2002 Toyota Land Cruiser

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
4.7L V84WD112.29.352852.85

Go to the Toyota Land Cruiser Vehicle Dimensions Data.

Compare the Toyota Land Cruiser Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2020 vs. 2013

2019 vs. 2008

2004 vs. 2014

2010 vs. 2015

2021 vs. 2016