facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2010 Mitsubishi Outlander

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
ES2.4L I4FWD66.15.51167.91.68
ES2.4L I44WD66.15.51167.91.68
GT3.0L V666.15.51167.91.68
SE2.4L I4FWD67.75.641721.72
SE2.4L I44WD67.75.641721.72
XLS3.0L V6FWD67.75.641721.72
XLS3.0L V64WD67.75.641721.72

2008 Mitsubishi Outlander

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
ES (4 Cyl)2.4L I4FWD66.15.51167.91.68
ES (4 Cyl)2.4L I44WD66.15.51167.91.68
LS3.0L V6FWD67.75.641721.72
LS3.0L V64WD67.75.641721.72
SE (4 Cyl)2.4L I4FWD67.75.641721.72
SE (4 Cyl)2.4L I44WD67.75.641721.72
XLS3.0L V6FWD67.75.641721.72
XLS3.0L V64WD67.75.641721.72

Length

2010 Mitsubishi Outlander

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
ES2.4L I4FWD183.715.31466.64.67
ES2.4L I44WD183.715.31466.64.67
GT3.0L V6183.715.31466.64.67
SE2.4L I4FWD183.715.31466.64.67
SE2.4L I44WD183.715.31466.64.67
XLS3.0L V6FWD183.715.31466.64.67
XLS3.0L V64WD183.715.31466.64.67

2008 Mitsubishi Outlander

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
ES (4 Cyl)2.4L I4FWD182.715.22464.14.64
ES (4 Cyl)2.4L I44WD182.715.22464.14.64
LS3.0L V6FWD182.715.22464.14.64
LS3.0L V64WD182.715.22464.14.64
SE (4 Cyl)2.4L I4FWD182.715.22464.14.64
SE (4 Cyl)2.4L I44WD182.715.22464.14.64
XLS3.0L V6FWD182.715.22464.14.64
XLS3.0L V64WD182.715.22464.14.64

Width Without Mirrors

2010 Mitsubishi Outlander

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
ES2.4L I4FWD70.95.91180.11.8
ES2.4L I44WD70.95.91180.11.8
GT3.0L V670.95.91180.11.8
SE2.4L I4FWD70.95.91180.11.8
SE2.4L I44WD70.95.91180.11.8
XLS3.0L V6FWD70.95.91180.11.8
XLS3.0L V64WD70.95.91180.11.8

2008 Mitsubishi Outlander

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
ES (4 Cyl)2.4L I4FWD70.95.91180.11.8
ES (4 Cyl)2.4L I44WD70.95.91180.11.8
LS3.0L V6FWD70.95.91180.11.8
LS3.0L V64WD70.95.91180.11.8
SE (4 Cyl)2.4L I4FWD70.95.91180.11.8
SE (4 Cyl)2.4L I44WD70.95.91180.11.8
XLS3.0L V6FWD70.95.91180.11.8
XLS3.0L V64WD70.95.91180.11.8

Wheelbase

2010 Mitsubishi Outlander

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
ES2.4L I4FWD105.18.762672.67
ES2.4L I44WD105.18.762672.67
GT3.0L V6105.18.762672.67
SE2.4L I4FWD105.18.762672.67
SE2.4L I44WD105.18.762672.67
XLS3.0L V6FWD105.18.762672.67
XLS3.0L V64WD105.18.762672.67

2008 Mitsubishi Outlander

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
ES (4 Cyl)2.4L I4FWD105.18.762672.67
ES (4 Cyl)2.4L I44WD105.18.762672.67
LS3.0L V6FWD105.18.762672.67
LS3.0L V64WD105.18.762672.67
SE (4 Cyl)2.4L I4FWD105.18.762672.67
SE (4 Cyl)2.4L I44WD105.18.762672.67
XLS3.0L V6FWD105.18.762672.67
XLS3.0L V64WD105.18.762672.67

Go to the Mitsubishi Outlander Vehicle Dimensions Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Outlander Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2021 vs. 2024

2005 vs. 2022

2008 vs. 2009

2015 vs. 2007

2014 vs. 2003

Popular Vehicle Dimensions Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Outlander vs.)

2023 Nissan Rogue

2024 Jeep Compass

2024 Kia Sportage

2024 Chevrolet Equinox

2024 Ford Escape

2024 Subaru Forester