Specifications Comparison: 2009 Volvo XC90 vs 2012 Volvo XC90

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2009 Volvo XC90

Height

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Height (in)	Height (ft)	Height (cm)	Height (m)
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
7 Passenger	4.4L V8	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
7 Passenger RDesign	4.4L V8	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78

2012 Volvo XC90

Height

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Height (in)	Height (ft)	Height (cm)	Height (m)
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78

Length

2009 Volvo XC90

Length

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Length (in)	Length (ft)	Length (cm)	Length (m)
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
7 Passenger	4.4L V8	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
7 Passenger RDesign	4.4L V8	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81

2012 Volvo XC90

Length

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Length (in)	Length (ft)	Length (cm)	Length (m)
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81

Width Without Mirrors

2009 Volvo XC90

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Width W/O Mirrors (in)	Width W/O Mirrors (ft)	Width W/O Mirrors (cm)	Width W/O Mirrors (m)
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
7 Passenger	4.4L V8	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
7 Passenger RDesign	4.4L V8	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9

2012 Volvo XC90

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Width W/O Mirrors (in)	Width W/O Mirrors (ft)	Width W/O Mirrors (cm)	Width W/O Mirrors (m)
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9

Wheelbase

2009 Volvo XC90

Wheelbase

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Wheelbase (in)	Wheelbase (ft)	Wheelbase (cm)	Wheelbase (m)
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
7 Passenger	4.4L V8	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
7 Passenger RDesign	4.4L V8	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86

2012 Volvo XC90

Wheelbase

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Wheelbase (in)	Wheelbase (ft)	Wheelbase (cm)	Wheelbase (m)
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86

Go to the Volvo XC90 Vehicle Dimensions Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Volvo XC90 Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2020 vs. 2006

2016 vs. 2014

2018 vs. 2024

2005 vs. 2019

2003 vs. 2007

boosting_a_car_battery_shutterstock_422402086

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Can a Car Run Without a Battery? Battery-Less Journey

black_exhaust_can_accompany_a_rough_idle_shutterstock_481807549

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Rough Idle, Smooth Drive: Solving Car Performance Issues at Different RPMs

vibrant_and_engaging_digital_illustration_of_a_future_american_electric_car_manufacturing_plant

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Biden's Bold Move Could Make Your Next EV Cost More Than You Think