Specifications Comparison: 2009 Volvo XC90 vs 2010 Volvo XC90

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2009 Volvo XC90

Height

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Height (in)	Height (ft)	Height (cm)	Height (m)
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
7 Passenger	4.4L V8	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
7 Passenger RDesign	4.4L V8	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78

2010 Volvo XC90

Height

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Height (in)	Height (ft)	Height (cm)	Height (m)
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78
	4.4L V8	AWD	70.2	5.85	178.3	1.78

Length

2009 Volvo XC90

Length

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Length (in)	Length (ft)	Length (cm)	Length (m)
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
7 Passenger	4.4L V8	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
7 Passenger RDesign	4.4L V8	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81

2010 Volvo XC90

Length

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Length (in)	Length (ft)	Length (cm)	Length (m)
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81
	4.4L V8	AWD	189.3	15.78	480.8	4.81

Width Without Mirrors

2009 Volvo XC90

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Width W/O Mirrors (in)	Width W/O Mirrors (ft)	Width W/O Mirrors (cm)	Width W/O Mirrors (m)
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
7 Passenger	4.4L V8	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
7 Passenger RDesign	4.4L V8	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9

2010 Volvo XC90

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Width W/O Mirrors (in)	Width W/O Mirrors (ft)	Width W/O Mirrors (cm)	Width W/O Mirrors (m)
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9
	4.4L V8	AWD	74.7	6.23	189.7	1.9

Wheelbase

2009 Volvo XC90

Wheelbase

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Wheelbase (in)	Wheelbase (ft)	Wheelbase (cm)	Wheelbase (m)
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
5 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
7 Passenger 3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
7 Passenger	4.4L V8	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
7 Passenger 3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
7 Passenger RDesign	4.4L V8	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86

2010 Volvo XC90

Wheelbase

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Wheelbase (in)	Wheelbase (ft)	Wheelbase (cm)	Wheelbase (m)
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	FWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
3.2 RDesign	3.2L I6	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
3.2	3.2L I6	FWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
3.2	3.2L I6	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86
	4.4L V8	AWD	112.6	9.38	286	2.86

Go to the Volvo XC90 Vehicle Dimensions Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Volvo XC90 Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2003 vs. 2022

2008 vs. 2013

2004 vs. 2016

2023 vs. 2006

2019 vs. 2021

autopadre_main_img_blogpost_img

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Dalh2orean.com Is Now Part Of AutoPadre.com

car_with_low_tire_pressure_shutterstock_1535589788

Post Written By Jackson Briar

The Risks of Driving with Low Tire Pressure: Safety Impacts and Solutions

pile_of_scrap_catalytic_converters_shutterstock_1240093231

Post Written By Jackson Briar

How Much Platinum Is In A Catalytic Converter? Unveiling the Value