facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2009 Aston Martin DB9 vs 2011 Aston Martin DB9

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2009 Aston Martin DB9

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
(Manual)5.9L V12RWD504.171271.27
(Touchtronic)5.9L V12RWD504.171271.27
(Manual)5.9L V12RWD504.171271.27
(Touchtronic)5.9L V12RWD504.171271.27

2011 Aston Martin DB9

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
5.9L V12RWD504.171271.27

Length

2009 Aston Martin DB9

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
(Manual)5.9L V12RWD185.415.45470.94.71
(Touchtronic)5.9L V12RWD185.415.45470.94.71
(Manual)5.9L V12RWD185.415.45470.94.71
(Touchtronic)5.9L V12RWD185.415.45470.94.71

2011 Aston Martin DB9

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
5.9L V12RWD185.515.46471.24.71

Width Without Mirrors

2009 Aston Martin DB9

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
(Manual)5.9L V12RWD73.86.15187.51.88
(Touchtronic)5.9L V12RWD73.86.15187.51.88
(Manual)5.9L V12RWD73.86.15187.51.88
(Touchtronic)5.9L V12RWD73.86.15187.51.88

2011 Aston Martin DB9

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
5.9L V12RWD746.171881.88

Wheelbase

2009 Aston Martin DB9

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
(Manual)5.9L V12RWD108.19.01274.62.75
(Touchtronic)5.9L V12RWD108.19.01274.62.75
(Manual)5.9L V12RWD108.19.01274.62.75
(Touchtronic)5.9L V12RWD108.19.01274.62.75

2011 Aston Martin DB9

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
5.9L V12RWD1089.0274.32.74

Go to the Aston Martin DB9 Vehicle Dimensions Data.

Compare the Aston Martin DB9 Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2006 vs. 2011

2010 vs. 2014

2016 vs. 2007

2005 vs. 2013

2008 vs. 2009