facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2006 Aston Martin DB9 vs 2013 Aston Martin DB9

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2006 Aston Martin DB9

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
(manual)5.9L V12RWD51.94.33131.81.32
(techtronic)5.9L V12RWD51.94.33131.81.32
(manual)5.9L V12RWD504.171271.27
(techtronic)5.9L V12RWD504.171271.27

2013 Aston Martin DB9

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
6.0L V12RWD504.171271.27

Length

2006 Aston Martin DB9

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
(manual)5.9L V12RWD185.415.45470.94.71
(techtronic)5.9L V12RWD185.415.45470.94.71
(manual)5.9L V12RWD185.415.45470.94.71
(techtronic)5.9L V12RWD185.415.45470.94.71

2013 Aston Martin DB9

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
6.0L V12RWD185.815.48471.94.72

Width Without Mirrors

2006 Aston Martin DB9

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
(manual)5.9L V12RWD73.86.15187.51.88
(techtronic)5.9L V12RWD73.86.15187.51.88
(manual)5.9L V12RWD73.86.15187.51.88
(techtronic)5.9L V12RWD73.86.15187.51.88

2013 Aston Martin DB9

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
6.0L V12RWD746.171881.88

Wheelbase

2006 Aston Martin DB9

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
(manual)5.9L V12RWD107.98.99274.12.74
(techtronic)5.9L V12RWD107.98.99274.12.74
(manual)5.9L V12RWD107.98.99274.12.74
(techtronic)5.9L V12RWD107.98.99274.12.74

2013 Aston Martin DB9

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
6.0L V12RWD107.98.99274.12.74

Go to the Aston Martin DB9 Vehicle Dimensions Data.

Compare the Aston Martin DB9 Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2007 vs. 2011

2013 vs. 2006

2016 vs. 2005

2009 vs. 2014

2010 vs. 2008