facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2003 Mitsubishi Outlander

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
LS2.4L I42WD63.25.27160.51.6
LS2.4L I4AWD63.25.27160.51.6
XLS2.4L I42WD66.35.52168.41.68
XLS2.4L I4AWD66.35.52168.41.68

2014 Mitsubishi Outlander

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
ES2.4L I4FWD66.15.51167.91.68
GT3.0L V64WD66.15.51167.91.68
GT Touring3.0L V64WD66.15.51167.91.68
SE2.4L I4FWD66.15.51167.91.68
SE2.4L I44WD66.15.51167.91.68
SE Touring2.4L I4FWD66.15.51167.91.68
SE Touring2.4L I44WD66.15.51167.91.68
Sport ES2.0L I4FWD64.25.35163.11.63
Sport ES2.0L I44WD64.25.35163.11.63
Sport SE2.0L I4FWD64.25.35163.11.63
Sport SE2.0L I44WD64.25.35163.11.63

Length

2003 Mitsubishi Outlander

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
LS2.4L I42WD179.114.92454.94.55
LS2.4L I4AWD179.114.92454.94.55
XLS2.4L I42WD179.114.92454.94.55
XLS2.4L I4AWD179.114.92454.94.55

2014 Mitsubishi Outlander

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
ES2.4L I4FWD183.315.28465.64.66
GT3.0L V64WD183.315.28465.64.66
GT Touring3.0L V64WD183.315.28465.64.66
SE2.4L I4FWD183.315.28465.64.66
SE2.4L I44WD183.315.28465.64.66
SE Touring2.4L I4FWD183.315.28465.64.66
SE Touring2.4L I44WD183.315.28465.64.66
Sport ES2.0L I4FWD169.114.09429.54.29
Sport ES2.0L I44WD169.114.09429.54.29
Sport SE2.0L I4FWD169.114.09429.54.29
Sport SE2.0L I44WD169.114.09429.54.29

Width Without Mirrors

2003 Mitsubishi Outlander

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
LS2.4L I42WD68.95.741751.75
LS2.4L I4AWD68.95.741751.75
XLS2.4L I42WD68.95.741751.75
XLS2.4L I4AWD68.95.741751.75

2014 Mitsubishi Outlander

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
ES2.4L I4FWD70.95.91180.11.8
GT3.0L V64WD70.95.91180.11.8
GT Touring3.0L V64WD70.95.91180.11.8
SE2.4L I4FWD70.95.91180.11.8
SE2.4L I44WD70.95.91180.11.8
SE Touring2.4L I4FWD70.95.91180.11.8
SE Touring2.4L I44WD70.95.91180.11.8
Sport ES2.0L I4FWD69.75.811771.77
Sport ES2.0L I44WD69.75.811771.77
Sport SE2.0L I4FWD69.75.811771.77
Sport SE2.0L I44WD69.75.811771.77

Wheelbase

2003 Mitsubishi Outlander

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
LS2.4L I42WD103.38.61262.42.62
LS2.4L I4AWD103.38.61262.42.62
XLS2.4L I42WD103.38.61262.42.62
XLS2.4L I4AWD103.38.61262.42.62

2014 Mitsubishi Outlander

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
ES2.4L I4FWD105.18.762672.67
GT3.0L V64WD105.18.762672.67
GT Touring3.0L V64WD105.18.762672.67
SE2.4L I4FWD105.18.762672.67
SE2.4L I44WD105.18.762672.67
SE Touring2.4L I4FWD105.18.762672.67
SE Touring2.4L I44WD105.18.762672.67
Sport ES2.0L I4FWD105.18.762672.67
Sport ES2.0L I44WD105.18.762672.67
Sport SE2.0L I4FWD105.18.762672.67
Sport SE2.0L I44WD105.18.762672.67

Go to the Mitsubishi Outlander Vehicle Dimensions Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Outlander Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2019 vs. 2009

2012 vs. 2013

2022 vs. 2016

2007 vs. 2015

2008 vs. 2006

Popular Vehicle Dimensions Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Outlander vs.)

2023 Jeep Renegade

2024 Mazda CX-5

2024 Nissan Kicks

2024 Volkswagen Tiguan

2024 Chevrolet Equinox

2024 Hyundai Kona