facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Ford Ranger vs 2009 Ford Ranger

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2002 Ford Ranger

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
Regular Cab2.3LRWD64.95.41164.81.65
Supercab2.3LRWD64.85.4164.61.65
Supercab3.0L V664.85.4164.61.65

2009 Ford Ranger

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
Regular Cab Sport (4 Cyl.)2.3L I4RWD66.25.52168.11.68
Regular Cab XL2.3L I4RWD66.25.52168.11.68
Regular Cab XLT2.3L I4RWD66.25.52168.11.68
Supercab Sport4.0L V6RWD66.35.52168.41.68
Supercab XL2.3L I4RWD66.35.52168.41.68
Supercab XLT2.3L I4RWD66.35.52168.41.68
Supercab Sport4.0L V6RWD66.35.52168.41.68
Supercab XLT4.0L V6RWD66.35.52168.41.68

Length

2002 Ford Ranger

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
Regular Cab2.3LRWD187.515.62476.24.76
Supercab2.3LRWD202.916.91515.45.15
Supercab3.0L V6202.916.91515.45.15

2009 Ford Ranger

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
Regular Cab Sport (4 Cyl.)2.3L I4RWD189.415.78481.14.81
Regular Cab XL2.3L I4RWD189.415.78481.14.81
Regular Cab XLT2.3L I4RWD189.415.78481.14.81
Supercab Sport4.0L V6RWD203.616.97517.15.17
Supercab XL2.3L I4RWD203.616.97517.15.17
Supercab XLT2.3L I4RWD203.616.97517.15.17
Supercab Sport4.0L V6RWD203.616.97517.15.17
Supercab XLT4.0L V6RWD203.616.97517.15.17

Width Without Mirrors

2002 Ford Ranger

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
Regular Cab2.3LRWD69.45.78176.31.76
Supercab2.3LRWD69.45.78176.31.76
Supercab3.0L V669.45.78176.31.76

2009 Ford Ranger

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
Regular Cab Sport (4 Cyl.)2.3L I4RWD69.35.771761.76
Regular Cab XL2.3L I4RWD69.35.771761.76
Regular Cab XLT2.3L I4RWD69.35.771761.76
Supercab Sport4.0L V6RWD69.45.78176.31.76
Supercab XL2.3L I4RWD69.45.78176.31.76
Supercab XLT2.3L I4RWD69.45.78176.31.76
Supercab Sport4.0L V6RWD69.45.78176.31.76
Supercab XLT4.0L V6RWD69.45.78176.31.76

Wheelbase

2002 Ford Ranger

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
Regular Cab2.3LRWD111.69.3283.52.83
Supercab2.3LRWD125.710.47319.33.19
Supercab3.0L V6125.710.47319.33.19

2009 Ford Ranger

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
Regular Cab Sport (4 Cyl.)2.3L I4RWD111.59.29283.22.83
Regular Cab XL2.3L I4RWD111.59.29283.22.83
Regular Cab XLT2.3L I4RWD111.59.29283.22.83
Supercab Sport4.0L V6RWD125.710.47319.33.19
Supercab XL2.3L I4RWD125.710.47319.33.19
Supercab XLT2.3L I4RWD125.710.47319.33.19
Supercab Sport4.0L V6RWD125.710.47319.33.19
Supercab XLT4.0L V6RWD125.710.47319.33.19

Go to the Ford Ranger Vehicle Dimensions Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Ranger Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2022 vs. 2002

2020 vs. 2004

2023 vs. 2009

2021 vs. 2005

2019 vs. 2011