facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2016 Mitsubishi Outlander

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
ES2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
ES2.4L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
GT3.0L V64WD34.810.617.45.3
GT Touring3.0L V64WD34.810.617.45.3
SE2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
SE2.4L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
SEL2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
SEL2.4L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
SEL Touring2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
SEL Touring2.4L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
Sport ES 2.0L2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Sport ES 2.4L2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Sport ES 2.0L2.0L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
Sport ES 2.4L2.4L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
Sport GT 2.4L2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Sport GT 2.4L2.4L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
Sport SE 2.4L2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Sport SE 2.4L2.4L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
Sport SEL2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Sport SEL2.4L I44WD34.810.617.45.3

2008 Mitsubishi Outlander

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
ES (4 Cyl)2.4L I4FWD39.412.019.76.0
ES (4 Cyl)2.4L I44WD39.412.019.76.0
LS3.0L V6FWD39.412.019.76.0
LS3.0L V64WD39.412.019.76.0
XLS3.0L V6FWD39.412.019.76.0
XLS3.0L V64WD39.412.019.76.0

Go to the Mitsubishi Outlander Turning Radius Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Outlander Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2007 vs. 2016

2020 vs. 2014

2018 vs. 2024

2021 vs. 2008

2006 vs. 2017

Popular Turning Radius Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Outlander vs.)

2024 Chevrolet Equinox

2024 Ford Escape

2024 Nissan Kicks

2023 Jeep Renegade

2023 Jeep Cherokee

2024 Subaru Crosstrek