facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mazda 3 vs 2023 Mazda 3

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2016 Mazda 3

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
i GT2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
i Sport2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
i Touring2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
s GT2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
s Touring2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
i GT2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
i Sport2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
i Touring2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
s GT2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
s Touring2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3

2023 Mazda 3

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
Mazda 2.5 S2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Preferred2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Premium2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Premium2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Select2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.52.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 Premium Plus2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Preferred2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Premium2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Select2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 Premium Plus2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Preferred2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Premium2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Select2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 Premium Plus2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3

Go to the Mazda 3 Turning Radius Data.

Compare the Mazda 3 Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2018 vs. 2011

2022 vs. 2016

2017 vs. 2014

2015 vs. 2023

2013 vs. 2012