facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Ford Explorer vs 2002 Ford Explorer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2016 Ford Explorer

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
3.5L V6FWD39.211.919.66.0
3.5L V64WD38.911.919.45.9
EcoBoost3.5L V6FWD39.211.919.66.0
EcoBoost3.5L V64WD38.911.919.45.9
Limited3.5L V6FWD39.211.919.66.0
Limited3.5L V64WD38.911.919.45.9
Limited EcoBoost3.5L V6FWD39.211.919.66.0
Limited EcoBoost3.5L V64WD38.911.919.45.9
Platinum3.5L V64WD38.911.919.45.9
Sport3.5L V64WD38.911.919.45.9
XLT3.5L V6FWD39.211.919.66.0
XLT3.5L V64WD38.911.919.45.9
XLT EcoBoost3.5L V6FWD39.211.919.66.0
XLT EcoBoost3.5L V64WD38.911.919.45.9
Police38.911.919.45.9
Police EcoBoost38.911.919.45.9

2002 Ford Explorer

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
Sport4.0L V6RWD37.811.518.95.8
Sport4.0L V64WD37.811.518.95.8
Sport Trac4.0L V6RWD44.913.722.46.8
Sport Trac4.0L V64WD44.913.722.46.8

Go to the Ford Explorer Turning Radius Data.

Compare the Ford Explorer Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2015 vs. 2002

2006 vs. 2017

2019 vs. 2016

2009 vs. 2003

2014 vs. 2004