facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2009 Ford Explorer vs 2024 Mazda CX-9

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2009 Ford Explorer

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
Eddie Bauer4.0L V6RWD38.411.719.25.9
Eddie Bauer 4WD/4.0L V64WD38.411.719.25.9
Limited4.0L V6RWD38.411.719.25.9
Limited 4WD/4.0L V64WD38.411.719.25.9
XLT4.0L V6RWD38.411.719.25.9
XLT 4WD/4.0L V64WD38.411.719.25.9
Sport Trac Adrenalin4.0L V6RWD38.411.719.25.9
Sport Trac Adrenalin4.0L V6AWD38.411.719.25.9
Sport Trac Limited4.0L V6RWD38.411.719.25.9
Sport Trac Limited4.0L V64WD38.411.719.25.9
Sport Trac XLT4.0L V6RWD38.411.719.25.9
Sport Trac XLT4.0L V64WD38.411.719.25.9

2024 Mazda CX-9

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
0 3.3 PreferredElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 Preferred PlusElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 PremiumElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 Premium PlusElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 SElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 S PremiumElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 S Premium PlusElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 SelectElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 PreferredElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 Preferred PlusElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 PremiumElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 Premium PlusElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 SElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 S PremiumElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 S Premium PlusElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 SelectElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3

Go to the Ford Explorer Turning Radius Data or the Mazda CX-9 Turning Radius Data.

Compare the Ford Explorer Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2006 vs. 2014

2004 vs. 2009

2010 vs. 2015

2005 vs. 2003

2019 vs. 2018