facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2018 Ford Focus

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Legroom

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
ES2.4L I44WD42.336.1
ES2.0L I4FWD42.336.1
GT2.4L I4FWD42.336.1
SE2.4L I44WD42.336.1
SEL2.4L I44WD42.336.1

2018 Ford Focus

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
FWD41.933.2
RS2.3LAWD41.933.4
SE2.0L I4FWD41.933.2
SEL2.0L I4FWD41.933.2
ST2.0LFWD41.933.4
Titanium2.0L I4FWD41.933.2
S2.0L I4FWD41.933.2
SE EcoBoost1.0LFWD41.933.2
SE1.0LFWD41.933.2
SEL2.0L I4FWD41.933.2
Titanium2.0L I4FWD41.933.2

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
ES2.4L I44WD107.491.7
ES2.0L I4FWD107.491.7
GT2.4L I4FWD107.491.7
SE2.4L I44WD107.491.7
SEL2.4L I44WD107.491.7

2018 Ford Focus

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
FWD106.484.3
RS2.3LAWD106.484.8
SE2.0L I4FWD106.484.3
SEL2.0L I4FWD106.484.3
ST2.0LFWD106.484.8
Titanium2.0L I4FWD106.484.3
S2.0L I4FWD106.484.3
SE EcoBoost1.0LFWD106.484.3
SE1.0LFWD106.484.3
SEL2.0L I4FWD106.484.3
Titanium2.0L I4FWD106.484.3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Legroom Data or the Ford Focus Legroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Legroom Side-By-Side by Year

2009 vs. 2013

2008 vs. 2007

2017 vs. 2012

2005 vs. 2011

2014 vs. 2003

Popular Legroom Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)

2013 Suzuki SX4

2022 Hyundai Accent

2019 Chevrolet Cruze

2024 Subaru Impreza

2024 Mazda 3

2017 Buick Verano