facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2009 Ford Explorer vs 2002 Ford Explorer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Engine Horsepower & Torque

2009 Ford Explorer

Engine Horsepower & Torque

Trim Eng. Drive train HP Torque (ft-lbs)
Eddie Bauer4.0L V6RWD210254
Eddie Bauer 4WD/4.0L V64WD210254
Limited4.0L V6RWD210254
Limited 4WD/4.0L V64WD210254
XLT4.0L V6RWD210254
XLT 4WD/4.0L V64WD210254
Sport Trac Adrenalin4.0L V6RWD210254
Sport Trac Adrenalin4.0L V6AWD210254
Sport Trac Limited4.0L V6RWD210254
Sport Trac Limited4.0L V64WD210254
Sport Trac XLT4.0L V6RWD210254
Sport Trac XLT4.0L V64WD210254

2002 Ford Explorer

Engine Horsepower & Torque

Trim Eng. Drive train HP Torque (ft-lbs)
Eddie Bauer4.0L V6RWD210254
Eddie Bauer4.0L V64WD210254
Limited4.0L V6RWD210254
Limited4.0L V64WD210254
XLS4.0L V6RWD210254
XLS4.0L V64WD210254
XLT4.0L V6RWD210254
XLT4.0L V64WD210254
Sport4.0L V6RWD203237
Sport4.0L V64WD203237
Sport Trac4.0L V6RWD210240
Sport Trac4.0L V64WD210240

Engine Horsepower Per Unit Of Displacement

2009 Ford Explorer

Horsepower Per Liter & Inch3

Trim Eng. Drive train HP Per Liter HP Per Inch3
Eddie Bauer4.0L V6RWD520.86
Eddie Bauer 4WD/4.0L V64WD520.86
Limited4.0L V6RWD520.86
Limited 4WD/4.0L V64WD520.86
XLT4.0L V6RWD520.86
XLT 4WD/4.0L V64WD520.86
Sport Trac Adrenalin4.0L V6RWD520.86
Sport Trac Adrenalin4.0L V6AWD520.86
Sport Trac Limited4.0L V6RWD520.86
Sport Trac Limited4.0L V64WD520.86
Sport Trac XLT4.0L V6RWD520.86
Sport Trac XLT4.0L V64WD520.86

2002 Ford Explorer

Horsepower Per Liter & Inch3

Trim Eng. Drive train HP Per Liter HP Per Inch3
Eddie Bauer4.0L V6RWD520.86
Eddie Bauer4.0L V64WD520.86
Limited4.0L V6RWD520.86
Limited4.0L V64WD520.86
XLS4.0L V6RWD520.86
XLS4.0L V64WD520.86
XLT4.0L V6RWD520.86
XLT4.0L V64WD520.86
Sport4.0L V6RWD500.83
Sport4.0L V64WD500.83
Sport Trac4.0L V6RWD520.86
Sport Trac4.0L V64WD520.86

Go to the Ford Explorer Horsepower And Torque Data.

Compare the Ford Explorer Horsepower And Torque Side-By-Side by Year

2010 vs. 2011

2023 vs. 2020

2005 vs. 2008

2013 vs. 2017

2002 vs. 2014