Specifications Comparison: 2006 Chevrolet Suburban vs 2002 Chevrolet Suburban

Engine Horsepower & Torque

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	HP	Torque (ft-lbs)
C1500 LS	V8	RWD	295	335
C1500 LT	V8	RWD	295	335
C1500 Z71	V8	RWD	295	335
C2500 LS	V8	RWD	335	375
C2500 LT	V8	RWD	335	375
K1500 LS	V8	4WD	295	335
K1500 LT	V8	4WD	295	335
K1500 LTZ	V8	4WD	335	375
K1500 Z71	V8	4WD	295	335
K2500 LS	V8	4WD	335	375
K2500 LT	V8	4WD	335	375

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	HP	Torque (ft-lbs)
C1500 LS	5.3L V8	None	285	325
C2500 LS	V8	None	320	365
C2500 LT	6.0L V8	RWD	320	365
K1500 LS	5.3L V8	None	285	325
K2500 LS	V8	None	320	365
K2500 LT	6.0L V8	4WD	320	365

No Data Available: 2006 Chevrolet Suburban Engine Horsepower Per Liter & Inch³ Of Engine Displacement

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	HP Per Liter	HP Per Inch³
C1500 LS	5.3L V8	None	53	0.88
C2500 LT	6.0L V8	RWD	53	0.87
K1500 LS	5.3L V8	None	53	0.88
K2500 LT	6.0L V8	4WD	53	0.87

Vs.

(Chevrolet Suburban vs.)

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Post Written By Jackson Briar