Specifications Comparison: 2002 MINI Cooper vs 2013 MINI Cooper

Engine Horsepower & Torque

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	HP	Torque (ft-lbs)
Hardtop		FWD	115	110
Hardtop S		FWD	163	155

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	HP	Torque (ft-lbs)
Clubman	1.6L	FWD	122	118
Clubman John Works I	1.6L	FWD	211	192
Clubman S	1.6L	FWD	184	177
	1.6L	FWD	120	118
John Works	1.6L I4	FWD	211	207
S	1.6L I4	FWD	175	177
Countryman	1.6L I4	FWD	122	118
Countryman John Work	1.6L I4	AWD	215	380
Countryman S	1.6L I4	AWD	181	177
Countryman S	1.6L I4	FWD	181	177
	1.6L I4	FWD	122	118
John Works	1.6L I4	FWD	211	192
S	1.6L I4	FWD	184	177
Hardtop	1.6L I4	FWD	121	114
Hardtop John Works GP	1.6L I4	FWD	208	192
Hardtop John Works	1.6L I4	FWD	208	192
Hardtop S	1.6L I4	FWD	181	177
Paceman	1.6L I4	FWD	121	118
Paceman JCW	1.6L I4	AWD	215	380
Paceman S	1.6L I4	AWD	181	177
Paceman S	1.6L I4	FWD	181	177
	1.6L I4	FWD	122	118
John Works	1.6L I4	FWD	211	192
S	1.6L I4	FWD	184	177

No Data Available: 2002 MINI Cooper Engine Horsepower Per Liter & Inch³ Of Engine Displacement

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	HP Per Liter	HP Per Inch³
Clubman	1.6L	FWD	76	1.24
Clubman John Works I	1.6L	FWD	131	2.15
Clubman S	1.6L	FWD	115	1.88
	1.6L	FWD	75	1.22
John Works	1.6L I4	FWD	131	2.15
S	1.6L I4	FWD	109	1.79
Countryman	1.6L I4	FWD	76	1.24
Countryman John Work	1.6L I4	AWD	134	2.19
Countryman S	1.6L I4	AWD	113	1.85
Countryman S	1.6L I4	FWD	113	1.85
	1.6L I4	FWD	76	1.24
John Works	1.6L I4	FWD	131	2.15
S	1.6L I4	FWD	115	1.88
Hardtop	1.6L I4	FWD	75	1.23
Hardtop John Works GP	1.6L I4	FWD	130	2.12
Hardtop John Works	1.6L I4	FWD	130	2.12
Hardtop S	1.6L I4	FWD	113	1.85
Paceman	1.6L I4	FWD	75	1.23
Paceman JCW	1.6L I4	AWD	134	2.19
Paceman S	1.6L I4	AWD	113	1.85
Paceman S	1.6L I4	FWD	113	1.85
	1.6L I4	FWD	76	1.24
John Works	1.6L I4	FWD	131	2.15
S	1.6L I4	FWD	115	1.88