Specifications Comparison: 2002 Chevrolet Suburban vs 2003 Chevrolet Suburban

Engine Horsepower & Torque

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	HP	Torque (ft-lbs)
C1500 LS	5.3L V8	None	285	325
C2500 LS	V8	None	320	365
C2500 LT	6.0L V8	RWD	320	365
K1500 LS	5.3L V8	None	285	325
K2500 LS	V8	None	320	365
K2500 LT	6.0L V8	4WD	320	365

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	HP	Torque (ft-lbs)
C1500 LS	V8	RWD	285	325
C1500 LT	V8	RWD	285	325
C2500 LS	V8	RWD	320	360
C2500 LT	V8	RWD	320	360
K1500 LS	V8	4WD	285	325
K1500 LT	V8	4WD	285	325
K2500 LS	V8	4WD	320	360
K2500 LT	V8	4WD	320	360

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	HP Per Liter	HP Per Inch³
C1500 LS	5.3L V8	None	53	0.88
C2500 LT	6.0L V8	RWD	53	0.87
K1500 LS	5.3L V8	None	53	0.88
K2500 LT	6.0L V8	4WD	53	0.87

No Data Available: 2003 Chevrolet Suburban Engine Horsepower Per Liter & Inch³ Of Engine Displacement

Vs.

(Chevrolet Suburban vs.)

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Post Written By Jackson Briar