facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2013 Suzuki SX4

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.4L I44WD39.636.9
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GT2.4L I4FWD38.536.9
SE2.4L I44WD39.636.9
SEL2.4L I44WD39.636.9

2013 Suzuki SX4

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
2.0L I4AWD39.637.6
2.0L I4FWD39.637.6
2.0L I4FWD39.637.6
LE2.0L I4FWD39.637.6
Sport SE2.0L I4FWD39.637.6

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.4L I44WD100.693.7
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GT2.4L I4FWD97.893.7
SE2.4L I44WD100.693.7
SEL2.4L I44WD100.693.7

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
2.0L I4AWD100.695.5
2.0L I4FWD100.695.5
2.0L I4FWD100.695.5
LE2.0L I4FWD100.695.5
Sport SE2.0L I4FWD100.695.5

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data or the Suzuki SX4 Headroom Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2008 vs. 2006

2003 vs. 2002

2005 vs. 2012

2010 vs. 2009

2014 vs. 2017