facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.4L I44WD39.636.9
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GT2.4L I4FWD38.536.9
SE2.4L I44WD39.636.9
SEL2.4L I44WD39.636.9

2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
DE2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
GTS2.0L I4FWD39.636.9

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.4L I44WD100.693.7
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GT2.4L I4FWD97.893.7
SE2.4L I44WD100.693.7
SEL2.4L I44WD100.693.7

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
DE2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
GTS2.0L I4FWD100.693.7

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2008 vs. 2007

2004 vs. 2013

2014 vs. 2002

2012 vs. 2005

2010 vs. 2015