facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.4L I44WD39.636.9
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GT2.4L I4FWD38.536.9
SE2.4L I44WD39.636.9
SEL2.4L I44WD39.636.9

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Evolution2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
Evolution RS2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Ralliart2.4L I4FWD39.436.7
SE2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.4L I44WD100.693.7
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GT2.4L I4FWD97.893.7
SE2.4L I44WD100.693.7
SEL2.4L I44WD100.693.7

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Evolution2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
Evolution RS2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Ralliart2.4L I4FWD100.193.2
SE2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2011 vs. 2012

2005 vs. 2008

2016 vs. 2003

2014 vs. 2004

2006 vs. 2007