facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.4L I44WD39.636.9
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GT2.4L I4FWD38.536.9
SE2.4L I44WD39.636.9
SEL2.4L I44WD39.636.9

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
LS2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.4L I44WD100.693.7
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GT2.4L I4FWD97.893.7
SE2.4L I44WD100.693.7
SEL2.4L I44WD100.693.7

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
LS2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2008 vs. 2017

2010 vs. 2003

2016 vs. 2005

2009 vs. 2006

2015 vs. 2012