facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2013 Toyota Matrix vs 2010 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2013 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
L1.8L I4FWD40.539.3
S2.4L I4FWD40.539.3
S2.4L I4AWD40.539.3

2010 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD40.539.3
S2.4L I4FWD40.539.3
S2.4L I4AWD40.539.3
XRS2.4L I4FWD40.539.3

2013 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
L1.8L I4FWD102.999.8
S2.4L I4FWD102.999.8
S2.4L I4AWD102.999.8

2013 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD102.999.8
S2.4L I4FWD102.999.8
S2.4L I4AWD102.999.8
XRS2.4L I4FWD102.999.8

Go to the Toyota Matrix Headroom Data.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2006 vs. 2011

2010 vs. 2013

2008 vs. 2005

2004 vs. 2012

2007 vs. 2009