facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2012 Mazda CX-9 vs 2016 Mazda CX-9

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2012 Mazda CX-9

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
GT3.7L V6FWD39.63935.4
GT3.7L V6AWD39.63935.4
Sport3.7L V6FWD39.63935.4
Sport3.7L V6AWD39.63935.4
Touring3.7L V6FWD39.63935.4
Touring3.7L V6AWD39.63935.4

2016 Mazda CX-9

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
GT2.5L I4FWD39.338.535.4
GT2.5L I4AWD39.338.535.4
Signature2.5L I4AWD39.338.535.4
Sport2.5L I4FWD39.338.535.4
Sport2.5L I4AWD39.338.535.4
Touring2.5L I4FWD39.338.535.4
Touring2.5L I4AWD39.338.535.4

2012 Mazda CX-9

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
GT3.7L V6FWD100.699.189.9
GT3.7L V6AWD100.699.189.9
Sport3.7L V6FWD100.699.189.9
Sport3.7L V6AWD100.699.189.9
Touring3.7L V6FWD100.699.189.9
Touring3.7L V6AWD100.699.189.9

2012 Mazda CX-9

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
GT2.5L I4FWD99.897.889.9
GT2.5L I4AWD99.897.889.9
Signature2.5L I4AWD99.897.889.9
Sport2.5L I4FWD99.897.889.9
Sport2.5L I4AWD99.897.889.9
Touring2.5L I4FWD99.897.889.9
Touring2.5L I4AWD99.897.889.9

Go to the Mazda CX-9 Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mazda CX-9 Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2013 vs. 2012

2022 vs. 2009

2020 vs. 2019

2021 vs. 2011

2016 vs. 2015

Popular Headroom Model Comparisons

(Mazda CX-9 vs.)

2024 Chevrolet Traverse

2024 Toyota Highlander

2024 GMC Acadia

2024 Volkswagen Atlas

2024 Subaru Ascent

2024 Buick Enclave