facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2012 Ford Transit Connect vs 2016 Ford Transit Connect

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2012 Ford Transit Connect

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
Extended Passenger Van XLT2.0L I4FWD51.150.5
Extended Passenger Van XLT Premium2.0L I4FWD51.150.5

2016 Ford Transit Connect

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
Extended Passenger Van Titanium2.5L I4FWD46.845.141.3
Extended Passenger Van XL2.5L I4FWD46.845.141.3
Extended Passenger Van XLT2.5L I4FWD46.845.141.3
Passenger Van XLT2.5L I4FWD46.845.1

2012 Ford Transit Connect

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
Extended Passenger Van XLT2.0L I4FWD129.8128.3
Extended Passenger Van XLT Premium2.0L I4FWD129.8128.3

2012 Ford Transit Connect

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
Extended Passenger Van Titanium2.5L I4FWD118.9114.6104.9
Extended Passenger Van XL2.5L I4FWD118.9114.6104.9
Extended Passenger Van XLT2.5L I4FWD118.9114.6104.9
Passenger Van XLT2.5L I4FWD118.9114.6

Go to the Ford Transit Connect Headroom Data.

Compare the Ford Transit Connect Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2016 vs. 2019

2017 vs. 2015

2013 vs. 2022

2021 vs. 2011

2020 vs. 2023