facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2012 Ford Mustang vs 2004 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2012 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
3.7L V6RWD38.836.5
3.7L V6RWD38.534.7
GT5.0L V8RWD38.836.5
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD38.836.5
Boss 3025.0L V8RWD38.534.7
GT5.0L V8RWD38.534.7
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD38.534.7

2004 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
3.9L V6RWD38.135.8
3.9L V6RWD38.135.5
Cobra4.6L V8RWD38.135.8
GT4.6L V8RWD38.135.8
Cobra4.6L V8RWD38.135.5
GT4.6L V8RWD38.135.5
MACH 14.6L V8RWD38.135.5

2012 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
3.7L V6RWD98.692.7
3.7L V6RWD97.888.1
GT5.0L V8RWD98.692.7
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD98.692.7
Boss 3025.0L V8RWD97.888.1
GT5.0L V8RWD97.888.1
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD97.888.1

2012 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
3.9L V6RWD96.890.9
3.9L V6RWD96.890.2
Cobra4.6L V8RWD96.890.9
GT4.6L V8RWD96.890.9
Cobra4.6L V8RWD96.890.2
GT4.6L V8RWD96.890.2
MACH 14.6L V8RWD96.890.2

Go to the Ford Mustang Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Mustang Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2019 vs. 2015

2017 vs. 2006

2009 vs. 2012

2021 vs. 2011

2007 vs. 2003