facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2009 Ford Mustang vs 2002 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2009 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
4.0L V6RWD38.836.3
4.0L V6RWD38.634.7
GT4.6L V8RWD38.836.3
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD38.836.3
Bullitt GT4.6L V8RWD38.634.7
GT4.6L V8RWD38.634.7
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD38.634.7

2002 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
3.8L V6RWD3835.8
3.8L V6RWD38.135.5
GT4.6L V8RWD3835.8
GT4.6L V8RWD38.135.5

2009 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
4.0L V6RWD98.692.2
4.0L V6RWD9888.1
GT4.6L V8RWD98.692.2
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD98.692.2
Bullitt GT4.6L V8RWD9888.1
GT4.6L V8RWD9888.1
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD9888.1

2009 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
3.8L V6RWD96.590.9
3.8L V6RWD96.890.2
GT4.6L V8RWD96.590.9
GT4.6L V8RWD96.890.2

Go to the Ford Mustang Headroom Data.

Compare the Ford Mustang Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2019 vs. 2021

2020 vs. 2016

2009 vs. 2006

2024 vs. 2015

2008 vs. 2012