facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2007 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2014 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2007 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I438.836.7

2014 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GT2.4L I4FWD39.636.9
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD39.636.9
SE2.4L I44WD39.636.9
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.8
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD39.636.8

2007 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I498.693.2

2007 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GT2.4L I4FWD100.693.7
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD100.693.7
SE2.4L I44WD100.693.7
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.5
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD100.693.5

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2015 vs. 2016

2005 vs. 2014

2002 vs. 2017

2009 vs. 2011

2004 vs. 2010

Popular Headroom Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)