facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2003 Mazda B-Series vs 2004 Mazda B-Series

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2003 Mazda B-Series

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
Base2.3L I4RWD39.2
SE Cab Plus2.3L I4RWD39.235.6
SE52.3L I4RWD39.2
DS3.0L V6RWD39.2
DS Cab Plus3.0L V6RWD39.235.6
SE Cab Plus3.0L V6RWD39.235.6
DS Cab Plus4.0L V6RWD39.235.6
Base Cab Plus4.0L V64WD39.235.6
SE Cab Plus4.0L V64WD39.235.6
SE Cab Plus (AT)4.0L V64WD39.235.6

2004 Mazda B-Series

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
Base2.3L I4RWD39.2
SE Cab Plus2.3L I4RWD39.235.6
SE52.3L I4RWD39.2
DS3.0L V6RWD39.2
DS Cab Plus3.0L V6RWD39.235.6
SE Cab Plus3.0L V6RWD39.235.6
DS Cab Plus4.0L V6RWD39.235.6
Base Cab Plus4.0L V64WD39.235.6
SE Cab Plus4.0L V64WD39.235.6
SE Cab Plus (AT)4.0L V64WD39.235.6

2003 Mazda B-Series

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
Base2.3L I4RWD99.6
SE Cab Plus2.3L I4RWD99.690.4
SE52.3L I4RWD99.6
DS3.0L V6RWD99.6
DS Cab Plus3.0L V6RWD99.690.4
SE Cab Plus3.0L V6RWD99.690.4
DS Cab Plus4.0L V6RWD99.690.4
Base Cab Plus4.0L V64WD99.690.4
SE Cab Plus4.0L V64WD99.690.4
SE Cab Plus (AT)4.0L V64WD99.690.4

2003 Mazda B-Series

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
Base2.3L I4RWD99.6
SE Cab Plus2.3L I4RWD99.690.4
SE52.3L I4RWD99.6
DS3.0L V6RWD99.6
DS Cab Plus3.0L V6RWD99.690.4
SE Cab Plus3.0L V6RWD99.690.4
DS Cab Plus4.0L V6RWD99.690.4
Base Cab Plus4.0L V64WD99.690.4
SE Cab Plus4.0L V64WD99.690.4
SE Cab Plus (AT)4.0L V64WD99.690.4

Go to the Mazda B-Series Headroom Data.

Compare the Mazda B-Series Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2004 vs. 2008

2003 vs. 2002

2007 vs. 2005

2006 vs. 2009