facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2014 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
LS2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2014 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GT2.4L I4FWD39.636.9
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD39.636.9
SE2.4L I44WD39.636.9
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.8
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD39.636.8

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
LS2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GT2.4L I4FWD100.693.7
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD100.693.7
SE2.4L I44WD100.693.7
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.5
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD100.693.5

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2009 vs. 2013

2016 vs. 2004

2008 vs. 2010

2006 vs. 2007

2003 vs. 2015