facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
LS2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
DE2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GTS2.4L I4FWD39.636.9
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD39.636.9

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
LS2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
DE2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GTS2.4L I4FWD100.693.7
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD100.693.7

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2011 vs. 2017

2003 vs. 2005

2007 vs. 2016

2008 vs. 2012

2014 vs. 2010