facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2014 Ford Taurus vs 2020 Chevrolet Impala

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Gas Tank Size

2014 Ford Taurus

Fuel Tank Size

Trim Eng. Drive train Fuel Tank Size (Gal) Fuel Tank Size (L)
Limited3.5L V6AWD19.071.9
Limited EcoBoost3.5L V6FWD19.071.9
Limited3.5L V6FWD19.071.9
SE EcoBoost3.5L V6FWD19.071.9
SE3.5L V6FWD19.071.9
SEL3.5L V6AWD19.071.9
SEL EcoBoost3.5L V6FWD19.071.9
SEL3.5L V6FWD19.071.9
SHO3.5L V6AWD19.071.9

2020 Chevrolet Impala

Fuel Tank Size

Trim Eng. Drive train Fuel Tank Size (Gal) Fuel Tank Size (L)
LT w/ 1LT3.6L V6FWD18.570.0
Premier w/ 2LZ3.6L V6FWD18.570.0
LT3.6L V6FWD18.570.0
Premier3.6L V6FWD18.570.0

Gas Tank Range

2014 Ford Taurus

Fuel Tank Range (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train City (Miles) Highway (Miles) Combined (Miles)
Limited3.5L V6AWD342494418
Limited EcoBoost3.5L V6FWD418608513
Limited3.5L V6FWD418608513
SE EcoBoost3.5L V6FWD418608513
SE3.5L V6FWD418608513
SEL3.5L V6AWD342494418
SEL EcoBoost3.5L V6FWD418608513
SEL3.5L V6FWD418608513
SHO3.5L V6AWD323475399

2020 Chevrolet Impala

Fuel Tank Range (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train City (Miles) Highway (Miles) Combined (Miles)
LT w/ 1LT3.6L V6FWD351518434
Premier w/ 2LZ3.6L V6FWD351518434
LT3.6L V6FWD351518434
Premier3.6L V6FWD351518434

2014 Ford Taurus

Fuel Tank Range (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train City (KM) Highway (KM) Combined (KM)
Limited3.5L V6AWD550795673
Limited EcoBoost3.5L V6FWD673978826
Limited3.5L V6FWD673978826
SE EcoBoost3.5L V6FWD673978826
SE3.5L V6FWD673978826
SEL3.5L V6AWD550795673
SEL EcoBoost3.5L V6FWD673978826
SEL3.5L V6FWD673978826
SHO3.5L V6AWD520764642

2020 Chevrolet Impala

Fuel Tank Range (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train City (KM) Highway (KM) Combined (KM)
LT w/ 1LT3.6L V6FWD565834698
Premier w/ 2LZ3.6L V6FWD565834698
LT3.6L V6FWD565834698
Premier3.6L V6FWD565834698

Go to the Ford Taurus Gas Tank Size Data or the Chevrolet Impala Gas Tank Size Data.

Compare the Ford Taurus Gas Tank Size Side-By-Side by Year

2016 vs. 2006

2008 vs. 2014

2005 vs. 2015

2011 vs. 2018

2003 vs. 2004