facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2005 Audi A6 vs 2009 Audi A6

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Gas Tank Size

2005 Audi A6

Fuel Tank Size

Trim Eng. Drive train Fuel Tank Size (Gal) Fuel Tank Size (L)
3.2 Quattro3.2L V6AWD21.179.9
4.2 Quattro4.2L V8AWD21.179.9

2009 Audi A6

Fuel Tank Size

Trim Eng. Drive train Fuel Tank Size (Gal) Fuel Tank Size (L)
3.0T Quattro3.0L V6AWD21.179.9
3.0T Quattro Premium Plus3.0L V6AWD21.179.9
3.0T Quattro Prestige3.0L V6AWD21.179.9
3.23.2L V6FWD21.179.9
3.2 Premium Plus3.2L V6FWD21.179.9
3.0T Quattro3.0L V6AWD21.179.9
3.0T Quattro Premium Plus3.0L V6AWD21.179.9
3.0T Quattro Prestige3.0L V6AWD21.179.9
4.2 Quattro4.2L V8AWD21.179.9

Gas Tank Range

2005 Audi A6

Fuel Tank Range (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train City (Miles) Highway (Miles) Combined (Miles)
3.2 Quattro3.2L V6AWD400548474
4.2 Quattro4.2L V8AWD358485422

2009 Audi A6

Fuel Tank Range (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train City (Miles) Highway (Miles) Combined (Miles)
3.0T Quattro3.0L V6AWD379548464
3.0T Quattro Premium Plus3.0L V6AWD379548464
3.0T Quattro Prestige3.0L V6AWD379548464
3.23.2L V6FWD379569474
3.2 Premium Plus3.2L V6FWD379569474
3.0T Quattro3.0L V6AWD358527443
3.0T Quattro Premium Plus3.0L V6AWD358527443
3.0T Quattro Prestige3.0L V6AWD358527443
4.2 Quattro4.2L V8AWD337485411

2005 Audi A6

Fuel Tank Range (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train City (KM) Highway (KM) Combined (KM)
3.2 Quattro3.2L V6AWD644882763
4.2 Quattro4.2L V8AWD576781679

2009 Audi A6

Fuel Tank Range (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train City (KM) Highway (KM) Combined (KM)
3.0T Quattro3.0L V6AWD610882747
3.0T Quattro Premium Plus3.0L V6AWD610882747
3.0T Quattro Prestige3.0L V6AWD610882747
3.23.2L V6FWD610916763
3.2 Premium Plus3.2L V6FWD610916763
3.0T Quattro3.0L V6AWD576848713
3.0T Quattro Premium Plus3.0L V6AWD576848713
3.0T Quattro Prestige3.0L V6AWD576848713
4.2 Quattro4.2L V8AWD542781661

Go to the Audi A6 Gas Tank Size Data.

Compare the Audi A6 Gas Tank Size Side-By-Side by Year

2021 vs. 2017

2022 vs. 2014

2003 vs. 2010

2008 vs. 2013

2006 vs. 2012