facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2013 Suzuki SX4

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2017 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
ES 2.0 FWD Manual Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
LE 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SE 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SEL 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

2013 Suzuki SX4

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan Man LE FWD Trunk Volume15.5 ft30.44 m3
4dr Sedan CVT LE Popular FWD Trunk Volume15.5 ft30.44 m3
4dr Sedan CVT Sport SE FWD Trunk Volume15.5 ft30.44 m3

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

No Data Available: 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Volume

2013 Suzuki SX4

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr HB CVT Sportback FWD Cargo Volume51.8 ft31.47 m3
5dr HB Man Crossover AWD Cargo Volume54.0 ft31.53 m3
5dr HB CVT Crossover Premium AWD Cargo Volume54.0 ft31.53 m3
5dr HB Man Crossover Technology AWD Cargo Volume54.0 ft31.53 m3
5dr HB CVT Crossover Technology AWD Cargo Volume54.0 ft31.53 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data or the Suzuki SX4 Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2017 vs. 2003

2016 vs. 2011

2005 vs. 2015

2002 vs. 2013

2009 vs. 2008