facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2017 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
ES 2.0 FWD Manual Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
LE 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SE 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SEL 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Man DE FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT GT FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SE AWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
TC-SST Ralliart AWD Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
Evolution Man GSR AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
TC-SST MR AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2010 vs. 2009

2002 vs. 2004

2017 vs. 2008

2015 vs. 2012

2011 vs. 2003