facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Chrysler 200 vs 2011 Chrysler 200

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2016 Chrysler 200

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan LX FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan Touring FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan Limited FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan Limited Platinum FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan S FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan C FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan C Platinum FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan S AWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan C AWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan C Platinum AWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3

2011 Chrysler 200

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan LX Trunk Volume13.6 ft30.39 m3
4dr Sedan Touring Trunk Volume13.6 ft30.39 m3
4dr Sedan Limited Trunk Volume13.6 ft30.39 m3
4dr Sedan S Trunk Volume13.6 ft30.39 m3
2dr Convertible Touring Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Convertible Limited Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Convertible S Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3

Go to the Chrysler 200 Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Chrysler 200 Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2013 vs. 2015

2011 vs. 2016

2012 vs. 2017