facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2014 Chevrolet Impala

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2016 Chevrolet Impala

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
LS Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
LS CNG Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
1LT Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
2LT Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
3LT CNG Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
1LTZ Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
2LTZ Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3

2014 Chevrolet Impala

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
LS Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
LS Eco Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
LT Eco Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
1LT Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
2LT Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
1LTZ Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
2LTZ Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3

Go to the Chevrolet Impala Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Chevrolet Impala Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2011 vs. 2003

2018 vs. 2010

2019 vs. 2017

2020 vs. 2014

2000 vs. 2008