facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2015 Mercedes-Benz E 350 vs 2011 Mercedes-Benz E 350

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2015 Mercedes-Benz E 350

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
E 250 BlueTEC Sport Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 250 BlueTEC Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 350 Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 350 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 400 Sport Hybrid Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 400 Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 250 BlueTEC 4MATIC Sport Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 250 BlueTEC 4MATIC Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 350 4MATIC Sport Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 350 4MATIC Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 400 Sedan 4MATIC Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 63 AMG Sedan 4MATIC Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 63 AMG S-Model Sedan 4MATIC Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 400 Coupe Trunk Volume13.3 ft30.38 m3
E 550 Coupe Trunk Volume13.3 ft30.38 m3
E 400 Coupe 4MATIC Trunk Volume13.3 ft30.38 m3
E 400 Cabriolet Trunk Volume8.8 ft30.25 m3
E 550 Cabriolet Trunk Volume8.8 ft30.25 m3

2011 Mercedes-Benz E 350

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
E 350 Coupe Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 550 Coupe Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 350 Cabriolet Trunk Volume11.5 ft30.33 m3
E 550 Cabriolet Trunk Volume11.5 ft30.33 m3
E 350 Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 350 4MATIC Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 350 Luxury BlueTEC Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 350 Sport BlueTEC Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 350 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 350 4MATIC Sport Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 550 Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 550 4MATIC Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 550 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 550 4MATIC Sport Sedan Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3
E 63 AMG Trunk Volume15.9 ft30.45 m3

Go to the Mercedes-Benz E 350 Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Mercedes-Benz E 350 Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2013 vs. 2011

2016 vs. 2006

2012 vs. 2010

2007 vs. 2015

2008 vs. 2009