facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2014 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Chevrolet Impala

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2014 Chevrolet Impala

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
LS Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
LS Eco Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
LT Eco Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
1LT Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
2LT Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
1LTZ Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
2LTZ Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3

2016 Chevrolet Impala

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
LS Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
LS CNG Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
1LT Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
2LT Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
3LT CNG Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
1LTZ Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
2LTZ Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3

Go to the Chevrolet Impala Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Chevrolet Impala Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

1996 vs. 2016

2005 vs. 2018

2000 vs. 2011

2001 vs. 2015

2002 vs. 2013